Skip to content

RP_PP_SM_Revocation_018b

Objective

Verify that the Relying Party reads the status value at the credential's index correctly from a Status List Token in CWT format, for every permitted number of bits per status.

References

  • [Token Status List] section 5.2, 8.3
  • [RFC8392] section 7.2
  • [Token Status List] section 4.1
  • [ARF] Annex 2, PPNot_05, VCR_13, VCR_14
  • [ETSI TS 119 602]
  • [CIR 2024/2979 amended] Annex II

Profile applicability

  • Relying Party requests credentials in ISO/IEC 18013-5 mdoc format.
  • Relying Party checks the revocation status of PIDs.

EUDI-wallet relevancy

EUDI_generic | EUDI_required

Technology

  • Presentation of a credential in ISO/IEC 18013-5 mdoc format.
  • Status List Token in CWT format.

Preconditions

  1. The Relying Party is set to default_configuration_rp_1.
  2. The test environment publishes default_trust_configuration_rp, and the Relying Party has loaded it.
  3. Test case RP_WS_IA_MainInteraction_001b passed in the same environment.
  4. Every credential presented in this test case references a status list URI from which the Relying Party has not retrieved a status list before.

Test Scenario

  1. Perform a presentation for default_query_pid in which the Conformance Wallet presents default_credential_pid, issued with status index 15, in a valid Authorization Response, while the Test Status Provider serves a valid Status List Token for it with bits set to 1, in which the entry at index 15 holds 0x01 and every other entry holds 0x00.
  2. Perform a presentation for default_query_pid in which the Conformance Wallet presents default_credential_pid, issued with status index 15, in a valid Authorization Response, while the Test Status Provider serves a valid Status List Token for it with bits set to 1, in which the entry at index 15 holds 0x00 and every other entry holds 0x01.
  3. Perform a presentation for default_query_pid in which the Conformance Wallet presents default_credential_pid, issued with status index 7, in a valid Authorization Response, while the Test Status Provider serves a valid Status List Token for it with bits set to 2, in which the entry at index 7 holds 0x01 and every other entry holds 0x00.
  4. Perform a presentation for default_query_pid in which the Conformance Wallet presents default_credential_pid, issued with status index 7, in a valid Authorization Response, while the Test Status Provider serves a valid Status List Token for it with bits set to 2, in which the entry at index 7 holds 0x00 and every other entry holds 0x01.
  5. Perform a presentation for default_query_pid in which the Conformance Wallet presents default_credential_pid, issued with status index 3, in a valid Authorization Response, while the Test Status Provider serves a valid Status List Token for it with bits set to 4, in which the entry at index 3 holds 0x01 and every other entry holds 0x00.
  6. Perform a presentation for default_query_pid in which the Conformance Wallet presents default_credential_pid, issued with status index 3, in a valid Authorization Response, while the Test Status Provider serves a valid Status List Token for it with bits set to 4, in which the entry at index 3 holds 0x00 and every other entry holds 0x01.
  7. Perform a presentation for default_query_pid in which the Conformance Wallet presents default_credential_pid, issued with status index 1, in a valid Authorization Response, while the Test Status Provider serves a valid Status List Token for it with bits set to 8, in which the entry at index 1 holds 0x01 and every other entry holds 0x00.
  8. Perform a presentation for default_query_pid in which the Conformance Wallet presents default_credential_pid, issued with status index 1, in a valid Authorization Response, while the Test Status Provider serves a valid Status List Token for it with bits set to 8, in which the entry at index 1 holds 0x00 and every other entry holds 0x01.

Expected results

  1. The Relying Party rejects the presentation: its verification result reports a failure and releases no attribute value from the presentation, and the endpoint receiving the Authorization Response does not answer with HTTP status 5xx.
  2. The Relying Party accepts the presentation: its verification result reports success and releases exactly the attributes requested in default_query_pid, with the values of the presented credential.
  3. The Relying Party rejects the presentation: its verification result reports a failure and releases no attribute value from the presentation, and the endpoint receiving the Authorization Response does not answer with HTTP status 5xx.
  4. The Relying Party accepts the presentation: its verification result reports success and releases exactly the attributes requested in default_query_pid, with the values of the presented credential.
  5. The Relying Party rejects the presentation: its verification result reports a failure and releases no attribute value from the presentation, and the endpoint receiving the Authorization Response does not answer with HTTP status 5xx.
  6. The Relying Party accepts the presentation: its verification result reports success and releases exactly the attributes requested in default_query_pid, with the values of the presented credential.
  7. The Relying Party rejects the presentation: its verification result reports a failure and releases no attribute value from the presentation, and the endpoint receiving the Authorization Response does not answer with HTTP status 5xx.
  8. The Relying Party accepts the presentation: its verification result reports success and releases exactly the attributes requested in default_query_pid, with the values of the presented credential.

Comments

Each index is the last entry of the second byte of the status list, so a Relying Party that reads the bits in the wrong order within a byte, or computes the byte offset incorrectly, reads a neighbouring entry. Every step uses a newly issued credential.

Execute this test case once for each presentation flow the Relying Party supports (redirects, W3C Digital Credentials API).